WooMix (Illustrious)

Details

Download Files

About this version

1. hassakuXLIllustrious_v13StyleB

2. hassakuXLIllustrious_v32

3. prefectIllustriousXL_40

4. oneObsession_v18

I then performed a series of merges:

I first blended models *1 and 2** together at a 65/35 split.

Then I blended models *3 and 4** together at a 60/40 split.

Finally, I merged the results of those two previous blends together at a *50/50 ratio**.

After getting that base blend, I layered on two specific LoRA files, both at a very low influence setting of 5% strength:

1. The LoRA named USNR_STYLE_ILL_V1_lo...

2. The LoRA named 748cm_illu.safetens...

I blended the outputs of applying these two LoRAs together one last time at a 50/50 ratio.

For the very last piece, I used the VAE named purecolorVAE_v10.safetensors to finalize the colors.

F seems to have less black outlines in testing

Model description

Use CFG 5 for perfect saturation/sharpening IMO

Try "worst quality, low quality, lowres, blurry, pixelated, jpeg artifacts, oversaturated, watermark, signature, unfinished, sketch" negative tags sometimes having less can result in better images or even "worst quality, low quality, lowres, blurry, pixelated, jpeg artifacts, mosaic blur, watermark, signature, unfinished, sketch, bad hands, distorted eyes, bad fingers"

Now trying “worst quality, low quality, lowres, jpeg artifacts, cutoff, grainy, distorted, watermark, error, unfinished, sketch, draft, deformed, poorly drawn face, poorly drawn eyes, poorly drawn hands, fused fingers, bad hands, deformed hands, bad fingers, distorted eyes, censored, mosaic censoring, futanari, monochrome” you can remove futanari if you like it

Or even just "worst quality, low quality, lowres, bad" and even better "worst quality, error" can be better as too much negative tags can confuse the ai

Images made by this model

Sort by

No Images Found.

Model Type	Checkpoint
Base Model	Illustrious
Published	10/26/2025